Plan twice, shoot once.

Special Edition Iran – Timeline Part III

By Jay Holmes

As an intelligence operative, I have a passion for history. If we don’t understand what happened in the past, we can’t understand what is happening today and why. Currently, we are catching us up on the increasingly worrisome situation in Iran, which means taking a look at Iran’s past. Today, we focus on the fall of the Persian Empire in the face of the Islamic Arab Invasion and the dynasties that arose afterward.


Khaju Bridge

photo by Gire 3pich2005 at Wikimedia, worldwide public domain

642 A.D.

The Persian Empire unraveled. At the battle of Nahavand, an invading army of thirty thousand Arabs defeated a larger Persian army led by the General Mardan Shah. Mardan allows his army to pursue a band of a few thousand Arabs into mountain passes where well armed Arabs holding the surrounding high ground ambushed them. The Persians suffered about twenty thousand deaths and the remainder were wounded or routed.

The Arabs entered the high Persian plains and sacked several cities before the Persians could reorganize. The Emperor Yazdgerd III retreated to the city of Merv, and with help from the Huns and Turks, was able to hold off the Arab invasion for a few years. Yazdgerd traveled further east into Persia, but his own governors were in revolt. He was unable to organize a resistance against the Islamic invaders.

652 A.D.

The Persian Emperor Yasdgerd III was assassinated in Merv by an unassuming and harmless looking local miller who was able to approach him without alerting his guards. His son, Pirooz II, did his best to save the Sassanid Empire from the Rashidun Caliphate, and then the Umayyad Caliphate, but he was unable to bring together enough Persian warlords. Pirooz II eventually fled to China where he died. This left the once great Persian Empire under the rule of the Umayyad Caliphate.

656 A.D.

Ali ibn Abi Talid, the son-in-law of Muhammad, was installed as the Caliph in Kufa near Basra and ruled the Umayyad Empire including much of Iran.

661 A.D.

Ali was assassinated in the mosque in Kufa. Differing opinions over the holy status of Ali create the Islamic schism between what are now “Shia” and “Sunni” Muslims.

680 A.D.

Hussein, son of Ali, was defeated by the Umayyad army in Karbala. This solidified the split between Shia and Sunni Muslims.

750 A.D.

The Abbasid clan, descendants of Muhammad’s Uncle Abbas, decided they were the rightful heirs to Muhammad’s authority and they formed an army that defeated the Umayyad army. taking control of most of the Umayyad Caliphate. They moved the capitol to Baghdad.

817 A.D.

The compassionate and learned 8th Imam Ali ar Ridha foretold his murder and instructed his servants on his burial. Fighting between Arabs and Persians broke out across the Caliphate.

945 A.D.

Uyid warriors (Shias) marched into Baghdad and defeated the Caliph’s forces. They established a Shia capitol at Qom.

10th century A.D.

Persian culture flourished when Persia re-established strong east-west trade. A strong currency based on standard measures was again instated in the Empire.

1006 A.D.

In the Iranian city of Gonbad-e Qabus Amir, Shams Wushmgir had a 167 ft. (72 meter) tower built of baked brick. It is still reputed to be the tallest solid brick structure ever built. The ratio of the height to the diameter is Pi.

1020 A.D.

Fast and mobile warriors from what we now call Turkestan invaded Iran. They were fierce and merciless. They unwittingly repeated military events from Persia’s history by defeating the now more settled and sedentary Persians of the Caliphate.

In this sense, the history of Iran resembles that of the British Isles. Less civilized, more war like people took well-developed areas from more settled and civilized people. They, in turn, become more civilized and were then invaded by another wave of more barbaric people, and so the cycle continues.

1038 A.D.

Turkish Seljuk warriors invaded Persia in force and defeated a Persian army in battle near Merv. They decided to dismount long enough to stay and build a city. They set up a capitol in Isfahan.

1048 A.D.

Persian mathematician, philosopher, and poet Omar Khayyam was born. He was a great linguist, and he translated important works from around the world to Farsi. He also wrote his own important works on algebra and geometry. His poetry and philosophy had a long-lasting impact both inside and outside Iran.

1055 A.D.

The apparently romantically inclined Seljuk people had multiplied. They invaded Mesopotamia and set up a capitol in Baghdad. They, too, were starting to absorb the well-developed science and methods of government and commerce from Persia and Mesopotamia.

1118 A.D.

The great Seljuk leader Muhammad Ibn Malik Shah died. There was no succession in place, and the Seljuk Empire broke up into smaller kingdoms across Mesopotamia and Iran.

1221 A.D.

Genghis Khan, the fierce, fast-riding war lord, and his massive army descended from the northeast during their stroll from Mongolia. They liked taking anything they found. They didn’t like taking no for an answer. They conquered as they went with rapid successes and few delays.

The cities of Khorasan, Persia calculated that they outnumbered Genghis’ army four to one and refused to surrender. While it’s true they outnumbered the invaders, they were spread out in garrisons and were not as swift as the Mongols. Genghis was insulted by their failure to surrender so he captured the cities one by one and ordered everyone in them to be beheaded.

Genghis and his sons are not remembered fondly in the Islamic world.

1258 A.D.

The Mongols, led by Genghis’ grandson Hogul, conquered most of Iran, Mesopotamia, and Syria. They crushed the Caliphate of Baghdad and kill 800,000 people in the process. The area fell under the rule of the great Mongolian/Chinese Khanate. The population of Iran did not reach pre-Mongol levels again until the twentieth century.

1348 A.D.

Tamerlane, a descendant of Monguls, stylized himself in the fashion of Genghis Khan. He captured what remained of eastern Iran and set up another rule. He was no great rider of the plains, but his armies were great riders, and he was a good organizer and skilled political animal. He became a menace to all Islamic areas. He raided Islamic areas of India and Islamic communities further west.

1405 A.D.

The Timurid Islamic Dynasty was formed in Iran. Arts flourished anew. Once again, Persian miniature painting techniques were perfected.

1406 A.D.

The Turkic-speaking Qara Quyunlu dynasty moved its capital to Tabriz.

1469 A.D.

The Turkic speaking Aq Quyunlu dynasty took control of most of Persia.

1501 A.D.

Life turned grim again in Persia as it fell into a new dark age of ignorance and suffering. A Shia Islamic warlord and religious zealot of questionable religious qualifications by the name of Shah Ismail began a reconquest of Iran. He was an effective, if savage, warrior and he preached slaughter and torture of all that was not Shia.

Within eight years he conquered most of what is now modern day Iran. He made Shia Islam the state religion, and anything other than Shia was punishable by death. He installed loyal followers to control religious authority in Iran. He was not the last barbaric politician to employ religious-based hatred in order to control Iran.

1588 A.D.

Shah Abbas I ascended the throne of Iran. He was far less ignorant and ruthless than Shah Ismail. Iran began rebuilding a civilization and literacy, science, and arts flourished for a century. Architecture returned to great heights in Iran with the building of impressive arched bridges. Canals and irrigation were reformed. Engineering skills, literature, and art returned to the forefront of life in Iran. Abbas did not rock the religious boat. He reaffirmed Shia domination but installed his own selected “religious authorities.”

1650 A.D.

The magnificent Khaju Bridge of twenty four arches was built over the river Isfahan during the reign of Shah Abbas II.

In our next article, we will look at Iran’s external relations and the further development of a national identity.

Related Articles:

Iran’s Present is Iran’s Past — Part I

Iran’s Present is Iran’s Past — Part II

22 thoughts on “ Special Edition Iran – Timeline Part III

  1. That Ghengis Khan was quite a force. Wow- The Islamic factions have been going at each other for a long time- now it’s easier to understand the tensions in the Middle East and how difficult it is to get around.

    • on ,
      J Holmes said:

      Hi Emily. It is important for use to understand how old and deeply rooted many of the feuds in the Middle East are. Considerations of time and space didn’t allow me to describe just how tightly wound with faith and “divinity” the Shiite and Sunni fight is. For them, they are each taking up a fight that is not a matter of just their beliefs, but a struggle between truth and heresy.

      These are not issues that will easily be resolved by a peace conference.

  2. Hi Holmes.

    It really is hard to keep track of the ebb and flow of so many groups, but it certainly does help shape my understanding of Iran and the middle east in general. Despite the violence, they repeatedly incorporate mathematics into their buildings. Perhaps it’s a way to preserve a record of their abilities beyond the invading hordes.

    I had to grin at the section “the history of Iran resembles that of the British Isles … They, in turn, become more civilized.” Since they haven’t been conquered since 1066 surely they must be fairly civilized over there by now?


    • on ,
      J Holmes said:

      Hi Nigel. Sorry, I over edited. I was referring to earlier history of the British isles. It is a tale of waves of ambitious savages conquering what was there only to be absorbed by the more advanced life style and, therefore, become vulnerable to the next gang of Vikings, Saxons, or other ill-mannered and fierce Germanic tribes.

      Yes, the British are civilized (most of them), and I would say they were stably civilized before that nasty French tourist William showed up in the summer of 1066. William defeated military forces, but in the end his heirs became more British, rather than introducing complete Norman culture. The Normans made an impact but were, in my opinion, more impacted. The Normans did not show up as a “more fierce and savage” force than Harold’s forces. Harold simply didn’t have time to respond well enough to the invasion at Hastings after that nasty business at Stanford Bridge with that other (less civilized) Harold. I’m still mildly miffed about the outcome of that battle in Hastings. But, oh well, history goes on with or without my approval. At least the next time unwelcome visitors showed up on that coast of England, the RAF took care of it without any undisciplined charges down the hill.

      I owe you a touch of civility for the insult. I will think of something.

      • Ha, no insult taken Holmes! I was only poking fun. In truth, perhaps after all this time they could do with conquering to shake things up, a better balance of evolution and revolution, so to speak.

        It’s an old joke, but you never have to worry about the asymptote, you’ll never get there.

        This is a good series. Going to pick another country when it’s done?


  3. on ,
    Dave said:

    Is there any irony that the Chinese are now one of the biggest customers for Iran’s oil? Granted, they’re not Mongol, but they’re at least from the same neighborhood.

    • on ,
      J Holmes said:

      Hi Dave. The Persians of the middle ages were more involved with the Chinese dynasties than what I was able to describe in so little space so your point is sharper than you might have imagined.

      Given China’s permanent seat on the UN security council, what do you suppose the chances are of the UN effectively intervening against Iranian Nuclear weapons programs?

      Put the calculator away. Sometimes zero is just zero and the asymptote is unimportant.

      • on ,
        Dave said:

        Let’s expand on that a little bit, just for depression’s sake. What are the “chances…of the UN effectively intervening” anywhere? I expect that some of the UN peacekeeping forces deployed around the world do their best within the constraints placed on them. However, I struggle to envision “UN” and “effective” being used in the same sentence without a touch of sarcasm.

  4. The saga continues. Persia is indeed following the template for an empire. Taking the Sunni and Shia conflict forward, one would imagine that one side would align itself to anyone who opposes the sect in power. The Iranians may hold animosity toward those outside their particular belef but they can unite against a percieved enemy.

  5. on ,
    J Holmes said:

    Hi Tomwisk. I think you are right on multiple levels. No meaningful Sunni resistance can happen from within Iran. They are far too outnumbered. It is more visible in their relationship with Saudi Arabia and it’s Sunni neighbors. And yet Iran was allowed a warship port of call to a Saudi Red Sea base last week. That was certainly one of Saudi Arabia’s more interesting political decisions in recent years.

  6. Interesting comparison between the UK and Iran, there are other such regions on the planet as well and all of them have had a rough time remaining stable, except for the UK which I think has an advantage in the modern era by being an island.

    It never ceases to amaze me how many technologies the west ripped off from the east and relabeled to maintain the appearance of credit (in the past). Small surprise that they would now try to do the same in reverse.

    Great series so far, Holmes. Keep em coming.

    • on ,
      J Holmes said:

      Hi Ailica. “the best I can do is find Iran on a map.” You bothered to read an article about it and you can find Iran on a map. As for being informed that puts you in the top 10% of the worlds population.

  7. Nice stuff, Holmes. I love Iranian history, but it spans such a long period of time that it is nice to have a quick review like you have done here. I can’t imagine what it must have been like when the Mongols rode in to Persia, the mounted archers corralling the people into the middle of the town and shooting at will. I’ve heard that the rose in Iran today is still considered a symbol of the blood that was spilled at the hands of Genghis Khan and his army.

  8. on ,
    J Holmes said:

    Hi Mark. I am glad that you liked the article. I’m glad I wasn’t around to see the giant dust clouds that signaled the arrival of Genghis and his armies. That had to constitute one of histories most severe “uh-oh” moments. Thanks for telling us about the rose symbol in Iran. I was not aware of that.

  9. Pingback: Special Edition Iran – Timeline Part IV « Author Piper Bayard

  10. Pingback: Blog Treasures 2-18 | Gene Lempp's Blog

  11. Pingback: Special Edition Iran – Timeline Part V « Author Piper Bayard

  12. Pingback: Special Edition Iran – The Rise of the Ayatollahs and the Hostage Rescue Attempt « Author Piper Bayard

  13. Pingback: Special Edition Iran – Crossing the Nuclear Rubicon « Author Piper Bayard

  14. Pingback: Special Edition Iran – Two Months from a Nuclear Weapon « Author Piper Bayard

Leave a Reply

Return to Top
%d bloggers like this: