By Jay Holmes
This evening I treated myself to a theatre performance, or at least to the recording of a theatre performance. On March 1, 2014, Argentine President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner addressed the 132nd National Congress of Argentina. I was forwarded a recording of the speech, but had not taken the time to enjoy the nearly three-hour impromptu performance until last night. Former First Lady of Argentina Evita Perón was great at those well-rehearsed, seemingly “impromptu” addresses. Dream though she may, Cristina is no Evita.
The result was nearly three hours of speech with very little new or meaningful information. Cristina sees herself as a victim of dark conspiracies by the world’s wealthy movers and shakers. While I am no fan of the new age economic potentates, it’s not the job of the Argentine National government to whine about them. Their job is to develop effective policies to help the troubled economy of Argentina.
Cristina promised more cooperation with opposition parties, but she has yet to actually foster political cooperation in Argentina. In that sense, her speech was not altogether dissimilar to political speeches in any democratic nation.
In a theme that is gaining voice in the U.S. and some parts of Europe, Cristina claims the shale oil/gas development, known as “fracking,” will bring an economic boom to Argentina. In the U.S., the opponents of fracking like to hoist “No Fracking” signs at protests. What would it be in Argentina? Perhaps it would be something along the lines of “No Me Fraques.” It has a nice ring to it. Perhaps the more militant placards would read something like “Fraca Tu Madre.” I can’t wait.
According to Cristina, Argentina is enjoying its greatest economic growth since the Gauchos first set out to tame the Pampas. She doesn’t explain how chronically high unemployment and inflation that may be as high as 40% fits into this picture of economic Nirvana. To many observers, the growing slums around Buenos Aires paint an altogether different portrait of Argentina’s economy.
While Cristina is only partly to blame for Argentina’s current economic crisis, she can shoulder the blame for the current failed policies that have hurt Argentina. Nationalizing the Argentine airlines and oil companies has left foreign investors unwilling to help modernize the Argentine energy sector or invest in their economy. The traditionally strong agricultural sector has grown stagnant, and in spite of food shortages around the globe, Argentina is no longer enjoying the agricultural export profits that it once took for granted.
Cristina increased taxes on rural agricultural Argentinians and indirectly instituted price controls on agricultural products. The result has been food shortages, which is bizarre because Argentina is traditionally a food-exporting nation. Held up as national heroes in the past, Cristina is now using agricultural populations as scapegoats for this problem. That sort of adversarial relationship with Argentina’s farmers and ranchers plays well in most of Buenos Aires, but it only exacerbates the decreased productivity, and in the end it hurts the poorest urban dwellers the most.
April 2, 2014, was the 32nd anniversary of the ill-conceived Argentine invasion of the Falkland Islands by a military junta that wanted desperately to distract the Argentine public from their troubles at home. Subsequent governments have marked the occasion with a more somber form of patriotism that focused on remembering the loss of life that resulted from that failed invasion. This 2nd of April, the celebration included Cristina’s introduction of a new 50 Peso note that sports a map of the Falklands, or Las Malvinas as they are called in Argentina. The Beijing government, which recently employed similar propaganda methods concerning their expansionist aspirations in the Pacific, might be wondering if they’ll get a royalty for having their idea copied. I would tell them not to bother sending a bill. Most international bills arriving at the desk of the Argentine Treasury have been ignored of late.
One of the thrilling highlights of this particular three hour Evita sequel (sans music) was Cristina’s explanation to a fascinated audience that the Falklands are used by the U.K. for all of their electronic espionage against the southern hemisphere. Apparently, Cristina has not yet heard about that marvelous new invention that we call “the satellite.” You’ll be surprised to know that the Falklands are not just a southern headquarters of British intelligence systems, but that they in fact house ICBMs for use against South America. I’m not making this up folks. Translations of her speeches are available to any member of the public that wishes to endure nearly three hours of bad theatre.
So what do Evita 2.0’s recent theatrical extravaganzas mean? Anything? The answer depends on who you ask. I will offer you my best guesses.
The U.K. Ministry Of Defense has not further reinforced the Falklands in response to Cristina’s performances. That’s because they don’t take her very seriously. The Argentine military has languished since the Falklands War. Cristina has not delivered on her many promises to the Argentine military of new and improved bases or a major expansion of the Argentine Air Force. The U.K., on the other hand, has taken the precaution of installing a modern air defense system in the Falklands and has four modern warplanes stationed there. And no, there are no atomic weapons on the Falklands. Well, you say, certainly she would have rebuilt the Argentine fleet by now. No. She is patiently waiting to commission two modern carriers that are being built. Even though the U.K. Royal Navy currently has no carriers either, Argentina is still at a disadvantage. In all, whatever Falklands invasion Cristina Fernandez pretends to dream of won’t become a reality in the near future.
As for Cristina’s “all new, more whitening power, economic detergent,” don’t expect much change. While some critics of the Fernandez Kirchner Theatre Company are willing to compare Argentina to Venezuela, I don’t see them slipping that far. Cristina and her supporting cast can no longer count on automatic middle class support for radical economic reforms. She’s all but run her course. As well as I can guess, Argentina is unlikely to improve much in the near future, but it’s not likely to get much worse at this point. The socialist sky is not quite falling in Buenos Aires.
Enjoy the theatre season.
I started posting something on this yesterday, but stopped, because I was spending too much time on Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner -who, by reason of being a Left wing female in power, who dresses well, keeps herself fit, and is loved by the cameras-has become one of The Beautiful People – over whom the US Media swoons. “Those parties she gives ! How marvelous !!”
She and her late husband, Nestor Kirchner took care of THEIR economic needs by using political connections to buy unused school real estate at “throwaway” prices—and re-selling same at enormous profits…BUT :
The divine Cristina recently agreed to become Godmother to the expected child of a lesbian couple: an act proving worthiness to be counted among The Beautiful–and more than sufficient to erase any real estate maneuvers from memory.
ps: The Falklands (Islas Malvinas if you will) are 300 MILES away from Patagonia-the desolate southern tip of Argentina. They were first claimed by Britain in 1765; then re-claimed by Britain in 1833.
Apart from a week or so in 1982, they have never been Argentine—even by Beautiful People logic.
Thanks for your comment. Holmes isn’t able to respond at the moment, but he will reply as soon as he can. ~ Piper
Hi Mrmeangenes. I agree with you. The Kirchner crime ring had corrupt deals going that pre-date the school property scam, but all of those crimes will be forgiven as well. Apparently a large segment of the human race will forgive any crime if the criminal pretends to be promoting a political platform that the forgiving voters are aligned with. I have observed that sad phenomena in any nation where I have looked at their politics.
It’s disturbing to watch people support scoundrels that are hurting the interests of those very people. I suppose the world’s population will eventually minimize such absurd gullibility. Call me an optimist, but I think it might happen some day long after my children have died of old age.
As for the “press,” most of them would give adoring reports on that charming fellow Charlie Manson if only Charlie could buy as much advertising as the average politician.
Excuse belated response : had “puterprobs” -wound up buying replacement.
What I see-mostly-is a willingness to forgive almost anything done by a socialist/social fascist regime.
Argentina is for me a country that though it has had designs on democracy has always fallen short.
Thanks so much for your comment, Tom. Holmes isn’t able to answer for the moment, but I’m sure he will respond as soon as he can. ~ Piper
Hi Tomwisk. I had not thought of that, but it might be a pretty fair description of Argentina since the Leopoldo Galtieri junta so badly damaged Argentina.
Fraca tu madre. I`m going to use that.
LOL. Me, too. Holmes is a bit tied up right now, but I know he appreciates your comment and will respond as soon as he can. ~ Piper
Hi Emily. I’m flattered.
Cristina was running for re-election when we were visiting Argentina three years ago. The educated voters hated her shallow, self-serving policies. However, like Martinelli in Panama, Cristina gave just enough to the poor to win sufficient support to gain a second term, and her country has paid the price ever since. She is all about personal wealth, political power and self-aggrandizement. One has to wonder if her abuse of the power of her office and undermining of the economy in Argentina is enough to mobilize the people to unseat her. One can only hope Argentina can recover from the damage she has wrought on an unsuspecting people. – Mike
Hi Mike. All true. Sadly we could be talking about some of our elections in the USA or in the UK etc.
Can’t believe it’s 32 years since the Falklands War…where does the time go? Galtieri’s effort to fix domestic problems with a foreign venture. And he got away with it, to the extent that the efforts to prosecute him bumbled along until Menem pardoned him in 1989. I doubt it’ll repeat today – as you say, it’s all sabre-rattling.
Hi Matthew. Thanks for your visit.